« Everything In | Main | Grappling With the Poem at Hand »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"If Marche wants to convince the literary academy to return to the reading experience as its subject, good luck..."

Had similar thoughts about this one. Although I suspect there are some corners of the academy (out of the way places, little thought of by the mainstream) where good books are looked at as books rather than as subjects for yet another critical lens.

I agree that treating literature as a means to an end (rather than as an end in itself) has been around for a long time and remains as much a problem today as it did when such treatment began--probably with Plato? But to approach literature as data, as the Digital Humanities seem to do, is an indication of a genuine change in consciousness, I think. THe movement from the reading brain to the digital brain, as some say, or from analog consciousness to digital consciousness. To me, we are talking about a difference not just in degree but kind.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Daniel Green is a literary critic and sometime fiction writer. His reviews, critical essays, and fiction have appeared in a variety of publications, both online and in print. He has a Ph.D focusing on postwar American fiction and an M.A. in creative writing.

Daniel Green's Current Website