« Invitation | Main | Lutz »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thanks for this astute critique of Reed, whom I remember years ago as being thought of as "revolutionary" in that sense of him introducing rythmns and allusions in his work that were fresh and new, even the language "Mumbo Jumbo" had an cadence that was considered a way African rythmns could be an essential part of his story-telling. I think because he was more about these rythmns and the political rage of his times, as was Grace Paley or IB Singer daring to use Yiddish cadences and words in their Jewish work, or a Latino writer introducing Hispanic idioms now in contemporary work. Reed feels less effective in retrospect. That is, I think he was about the subversive power of ethnic sounds and words,injected literature, to be heard as shouts into a mainstream primarily white and male and Christian and those words were in themselves freshly part of his art. The words themselves were a kind of voodoo spell. But time and era-limited. We lose the urgency of his work now, that power.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


  • Daniel Green is a literary critic and sometime fiction writer. His reviews, critical essays, and fiction have appeared in a variety of publications, both online and in print. He has a Ph.D focusing on postwar American fiction and an M.A. in creative writing.

Daniel Green's Current Website